10 Principles of Economics¶
There's always Trade-offs¶
Refers to the fact that when picking an option, you're always giving up on something else; ie there is always an opportunity cost
It is due to scarcity of resources; every resource is finite; nothing comes free
Eg: when i want to study, i'm giving up sleep
Real Cost¶
Cost of something is what you sacrifice to get it Real Cost = relative price = opportunity cost
It's not just monetary cost
Rational people think at Margin¶
Rationality: making a decision considering all possibilities to obtain best outcome with minimal input and losses.
Marginality: making decisions considering incremental benefits/costs associated with an action; not at total benefit/cost
marginal profit (net benefit) = marginal benefit - marginal cost Proceed incrementing production as long as marginal net benefit \(\ge\) 0
People respond to incentives¶
Incentive: instrument to induce an individual to act/react tool to change behavior
Subsidies = +ve incentive Taxes = -ve incentive
Trade benefits everyone¶
- Reduces cost of production through specialization Specialists require lower resources for production, because they are really good at it; hence they can increase output
- Both parties gain a greater variety of goods and services
Overall trade gains depends on
- choice set
- cost minimization
Individual gains depends on
- Terms of trade basically means the exchange rate
- Bargaining power
- nature of the product (Shelf life / perishability) The one with the greater shelf life product will have greater bargaining power because they don't have to sell in a hurry
- elasticity of demand
Benefits of scale¶
You get larger benefits with lower costs if you focus on specialization at large scale
Larger systems are more productive per unit input
The average cost reduces when the volume of production increases
eg: college mess cooking $$ \text{Cost}(y) = y^\alpha $$ Where \(y =\) output quantity
Benefits of scale exists if \(\alpha < 1\)
Elasticity of demand¶
Elastic demand¶
Demand for commodity is highly sensitive to income of consumers
eg: smartphones
Inelastic demand¶
Demand for commodity is nearly independent of income of consumers.
Eg: coffee, rice, food Even if someone gets richer, they won't be eating more food
Markets are usually good¶
Economic Systems¶
An economic system is an arrangement of economic activity
Type | Description | Regulation | Competition | Variety in Products | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Private/ Market-Based/ Capitalist | Dynamically affected by what the producers produce and consumers consume Pure capitalism means that the market is free from govt intervention | Low/None | High (encourages people to perform better; everyone tries to optimize) | High | USA |
Centralized/Govt | Central authority dictates | High | Low | Low | North Korea |
Public | Communism Type | ||||
Hybrid | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | India (Centralized railways, while others are market-based) |
Functions of Market¶
-
organizing economic activity
-
determining the price supply reflects the availability/abundance of the commodity demand reflects the willingness for purchasing commodity price for a product without a market(demand/supply) for it is undefined
-
Signaling and allocation of resources
Price | Reaction of Production | Reaction of Demand |
---|---|---|
Inc | Inc | Dec |
Dec | Dec | Inc |
Not all market signals are pure market signals Distortion of market signal: when govt creates policies to change pricing in a free market Eg: subsidies
Government¶
Govt can help improve market outcomes
- Protect property rights
-
Generate efficient outcomes, such as prevent
- Monopoly
-
Tragedy of Commons for CPR(Common Property Resources)
For community resources(like fishing ponds, forests), the govt comes in to prevent over-utilization of the resources; supports sustainability
-
Market failure
- Market fails when it comes to non-excludable commodity
- Govt interferes in fields where private investors are not interested
Examples
- national defence
- community services
- landscapes
- fresh air
-
Promote equality/equity
- prevention of trade of whatever is socially harmful (alcohol, drugs)
- keeps market's obsession with efficiency at the expensive of equity in check
- reduces economic inequality
-
Socially desirable outcomes
Monopoly¶
private monopoly: unfair situation for consumers where there is only a sole producer of a product natural monopoly: situation where there is a single producer (like govt), but not necessarily bad; eg: Railways
monopoly can be addressed through govt subsidies for the monopoly the monopoly company will tend to increase output to attain the new maximum marginal net benefit hence, the level of optimal output will be greater after subsidies than without it, and hence the producers increase the supply this will reduce the price and benefit the consumers
Excludability¶
Excludable¶
possible to exclude whoever did not pay for it
Eg: netflix subscription
Non-excludable commodity¶
where it is impossible to exclude those who did not pay for it
eg: national defence, community parks
Idk¶
There is always a conflict b/w efficiency vs equity.
Term | Meaning | |
---|---|---|
Efficiency | optimization to maximize output with minimum input | doing things right |
Effectiveness | Impact of output | doing the right things |
Equity | Upholding morals, social norms, benefitting society/the world |
Rivalry of consumption¶
Consumption | |
---|---|
Rivalled | Availability of a product is dependent of its consumption |
Non-rivalled | Availability of a product is independent of its consumption That's one of the best things of digital revolution: it has enabled non-rivalry Eg: national defence, fresh air, lighthouses, netflix subscription |
Goods¶
Something that generates pleasure
You pay for it
Public | Club | CPR | Private | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rivalled | N | N | Y | Y |
Excludable | N | Y | N | Y |
Example | national defence | netflix | forests, natural goods | food |
prone to exploitation |
Bads¶
generates displeasure
you receive payment
Standard of living¶
Standard of living of a country depends on its production level
Measures for standard of living
- for individuals comparing real personal income
- for countries
- comparing real GDP shows the employment opportunities in the country
- comparing real GNP (Gross National Product) shows the status of citizens of the country
- per capita income and output per capita income \(= \frac{income}{population}\), per capita output \(= \frac{output}{population}\) shows the average contribution of people; doesn't show income inequality though
Disparities in standard of living is caused due to difference in productivity Productivity: amount of goods and services produced by a worker during an hour of work
i don’t exactly agree with this cuz women have a history of earning less for the same productivity
Income¶
Nominal income | monetary income |
Real income | \(\dfrac{\text{Nominal income}}{\text{Avg cost of purchases}}\) Reflects purchasing power: the quantity of goods and services you can buy |
IDK isn’t this the best? | \(\text{Value of savings wrt exchange rate}\) \(\text{Savings} = \text{Nominal income}-\text{Avg cost of purchases}\) |
GDP & GNP¶
GDP | GNP | |
---|---|---|
Full Form | Gross Domestic Product | Gross National Product |
Total value of final goods and services produced | within the borders of a country (regardless of nationality) | by nationals/citizens of a country (regardless of location) |
From the consumer's perspective, it is the same as national income ie, sum of incomes of all individuals is mathematically = GDP |
Nominal GDP & GNP¶
production quantity x prices of the current year
Real GDP & GNP¶
production quantity x prices of base year
Paradox of value¶
The paradox of value is the contradiction that, although water is more necessary than diamonds for survival, diamonds are costlier
Prices rise when govt prints excess money¶
4 functions of money
- Facilitates trade prevents the need for coincidence of wants; ie money prevents the need for both parties to want to exchange products that they want from the other person
- mode of deferred payment
- unit of value
- store of value
If you print money without them producing anything, money loses its value and inflation occurs However, if you print money due to increase in the country's output, then it's fine
When prices of commodity increases, value of money reduces
value of money \(\propto \frac{1}{\text{price of commodities} }\)
Inflation¶
Rate at which prices of commodities increase
happens when economy is doing well
upto 2-5% inflation is acceptable
Inflation Models¶
Taylor Rule¶
Inflation rate something
Money Supply¶
Inflation-Welfare Cost Relation¶
Optimal Inflation Rate | |
---|---|
Developed Countries | 2% |
Developing Countries | 4-6% |
Micro Effects¶
Money-givers gain
Fixed income money-receivers lose eg: regular employees
Variable income money-receivers not affected business people, freelancers
Macro Effects¶
Imports increase: demand for domestic products decreases, as they are costlier Exports decrease: as other countries do not want a more expensive product
Hence, high inflation is not good
Cost-Push inflation¶
Prices increase due to increase in the cost for supply
- cost of production
- prices of raw materials
- oil prices (transportation)
for the name, think suppliers push the product to the consumers
Demand-pull inflation¶
Prices increase due to increase in demand
for the name, think consumers pull the product from the sellers
Structural inflation¶
The suppliers are not able to keep up with the demand due to lack of infrastructure; ie, demand increases and producers want to increase output, but aren't able to do so
idk point: Agricultural inflation affects non-agricultural sectors, as agricultural products are used as raw materials also, agricultural sector depends on the manufacturing sector and vice-versa
Deflation¶
Rate at which prices decreases
in other words, it is negative inflation
more dangerous than high inflation
Welfare Cost¶
The cost associated with any action that has macro-level consequences and affects entire society eg: taxes, interest rates have welfare costs associated with them
Inflation/Unemployment¶
Economy faces a short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment
Short run: period where contracts cannot be renegotiated (monthly, quarterly) Lon run: a long period (annually) which contains multiple renegotiations of contracts
Unemployment¶
the fraction/proportion of people seeking jobs but cannot get
does not include people who aren't seeking jobs
Natural Rate¶
Unemployment rate which exists regardless of whatever we do
Depends on the country's
- resources
- technology
- production capacity/no of factories
- population/size of the country
Actual Rate¶
The current rate of unemployment
it fluctuates a lot
- during depression, actual > natural
- during boom, actual < natural
However, if you take the average of 20yrs or so, the average actual rate tends to the natural rate
Output¶
Potential output¶
predicted output an economy can ideally produce by using all its resources
Actual output¶
What an economy actually produces
Scenarios¶
- during recession, actual < potential
- during boom, actual > potential
Phases of economy¶
flowchart LR
Depression --> Recovery --> Boom --> Recession --> Depression
Phillips Curve Relation¶
- y-axis = inflation
- x-axis = unemployment
- \(\pi_t =\) Inflation
- \(\alpha =\) inflation when there is no unemploment
- \(\beta =\) cost for reducing unemployment by a unit
- \(U_t =\) actual rate of unemployment
This relation is only short-run for long run, whatever is the inflation, unemployment tends to natural unemployment the graph will be a straigth line parallel to the y-axis
During shortrun, the contracts for raw materials, employees is fixed but prices for commodity increases therefore, producers increase production to maximize profit (misperception by producers); this is done by increasing employees Unemployment rate decreases
Moreover, workers suffer money illusion (only focus on the nominal income increase; don’t realise that the real income is the same)
Then in the long run, few months later, the employees will renegotiate for higher wages; then the producers will hesitate as they no longer see the attraction for producing at such large volume and paying such wages; so they fire employees; therefore, the unemployment rate will increase again