Policies¶
Method to affect consumer behavior
The Impossible Trinity¶
flowchart LR
fer[Fixed Exchange Rate] <--> fcf[Free Capital Flow] <--> smp[Sovereign Money Policy] <--> fer
It is not possible to achieve all 3 simultaneously
Common Types¶
- Price control
-
Incentives
-
Taxes
-
Subsidies
Many companies give lower prices for online booking, to reduce waiting times at queues this is kinda like a subsidy. eg: in global village
-
Laissez-faire (no intervention)
- Educational intervention
Not very effective, as just providing information to humans does not guarantee that they will act on this information. According to classical economic assumption, this is perfect; refer Behavioral Economics
Government Intervention¶
Sometimes, govt may not be satisfied with the market outcome
great where market is not perfectly competitive
Price Control¶
when govt believes that market price is unfair to buyers/sellers
Price Ceiling | Price Floor | |
---|---|---|
price limit | legal maximum | legal minimum |
govt believes price is | high | low |
to protect | buyers | sellers |
binding policy | below equi price | above equi price |
effects of binding | 1. shortage 2. non-price rationing 3. creation of black market :( 4. discrimination by sellers | surplus |
Price Ceiling¶
sometimes, price ceiling may be 0 for illegal transactions such as prostitution, sale of organs
Non-price rationing¶
restore equilibrium through imposing limits on buying
help solve shortages
eg:
- purchasing limit for gas cylinders
- issue tokens
- long wait times cause the buyers to rethink if they need to buy
Oil Ceiling¶
case study
Rent Ceiling¶
- in short run, it is fine
- in the long run, causes a huge shortage in houses
“the best way to destory a city, other than bombing” 🤭
- people pay lower rents
- both rich and poor tenants gain
- landlords lose
- maintainence worsens
- (more points)
Alternative to Rent Control¶
Housing subsidies
effects
- no shortage
- equilibrium does not change
- helps only those in need
- however, the problem is funding the subsidies; which ends up increasing taxes
Price Floor¶
if the surplus is not taken care of, the sellers will be unsatisfied
- this will cause a black market
- and consumers will buy from there
The surplus is taken care of through non-price rationing by creating
- artificial demand
- the govt purchases huge stock of agricultural produce and store in times of natural disasters
- limitation on production quantity
eg:
- MSP for agriculture
- minimum wage
- pro
- child labor dec
- income of workers inc
- cons
- causes unemployment
- students drop out cuz they get tempted by the salary
- on-job training reduces, as the companies are paying a lot, so cannot afford to waste time
- some benefit goes to teens from rich families
Alternative to minimum wage¶
wage subsidies for low earners
the funding comes from taxing the rich
but taxes de-incentives the rich, cuz they don’t like it
(i zoned out for this part 😞)
Case Study: Sugar¶
US Sugar sellers faced a problem with repaying loans
govt created a artificial demand for sugar
purchased sugar at high price and sold to ethanol producers at lower price
govt faced huge losses
but helped farmers pay their loans
Taxes¶
compulsory payment citizens give the govt
- raise revenue/funds
- public projects, infrastucture, police
- discourage harmful activities
- (like sugary items)
- to make society less unfair and reduce income inequality
Implementation¶
Taxes can be imposed on
- buyers
- sellers
- both
in all 3 cases of taxation, the money buyers pay and sellers receive is the same
Taxes = consumer payment - seller receiving
\(P_b = P_s + T\)
Types of Taxes¶
Direct Tax¶
imposed on direct income of consumers
eg: Wealth, Income Tax
Indirect Tax¶
imposed on purchases/transactions
Specific Tax¶
imposed on quantity/volume of commodity
eg:
Ad volrem/Sales Tax¶
imposed on price of commodity
eg: GST, VAT
VAT¶
Tax imposed on the added value
Effects of Taxes¶
- quantity bought and sold reduces
- both buyers and sellers are affected adversely, regardless of who’s taxed
- govt earns revenue
- price that buyers pay \(\ne\) the amount the sellers get
Effects on equi¶
equilibrium is maintained, but the equi quantity reduces \(Q' < Q\)
geogebra
- Find the quantity at which demand-supply = tax (on the left side)
- Find new points on the supply and demand curve
Tax Shifting¶
the situation when burden of taxation is shifted from supplier to consumer, or vice-versa
Tax Burden/Incidence¶
burden \(\Delta P = |P' - P|\)
loss for supplier = \(\Delta Q \times \Delta P\)
\(B \propto \frac 1 {|e|}\)
the relative burden depends on elasticity of supply and demand burden is heavier on inelastic side
Cases¶
Elasticity | Elastic | Inelastic | Who’s affected more |
---|---|---|---|
\(\vert e_d \vert = \vert e_s \vert\) | - | - | both equally |
\(\vert e_d \vert > \vert e_s \vert\) | demand | supply | sellers |
\(\vert e_d \vert < \vert e_s \vert\) | supply | demand | consumer |
this is why basic necessities are not taxed, as
- demand is inelastic
- supply is elastic
- the burden of the taxes is borne by the farmers
- this would cause a shortage
Case Study¶
in 1990, US imposed a new luxury tax, such as on yachts, with the objective of raising funds from the rich
didn’t work and repealed after a few years, because
- demand for yachts is elastic
- firstly, it is a luxury good
- there are many substitutes and \(|e| \propto n_s\)
- supply for yachts is inelastic, or atleast in the short run
- hence, the producers felt the burden of the tax, rather than the rich consumers
Subsidies¶
compulsory payment citizens receive from the govt
it is the exact opposite of tax
uses
- help people in need
- +ve incentive, used to encourage certain actions
Subsidies can be given to
- buyers
- sellers
- both
price received by sellers = price paid by buyers + subsidies
\(P_s = P_b + S\)
Effects¶
- Price received by \(\ne\) Price paid by buyers
- Buyers pay less, sellers receive more
- Govt spending and investment increases
Effects on Equilibrium¶
equilibrium is maintained, but the equi quantity increases \(Q' > Q\)
Geogebra
- Find the quantity at which supply-demand = tax (on the right side)
- Find new points on the supply and demand curve
Benefit¶
depends on the elasticity
\(B \propto \frac 1 {|e|}\) (same like taxes)
benefit is more for inelastic side
\(B_b + B_s = S\)
if both are inelastic, the benefits depends on the ratio of elasticity
- eg: For agricultural subsidies, it depends
- eg: For oil,
Best Policies¶
- subsidies for basic necessities
- taxes for luxuries
Types of Policies¶
Policy | Incorporates | |
---|---|---|
Monetary | Central Bank | Interest Rates |
Fiscal policy | Ministry of Finance (Govt) | Budget, Tax |