Skip to content

Spot Markets

image-20240408131209558

Bilateral Contracts

flowchart LR
b[Buyer]
br[Broker]
s[Seller]

b <--> br <--> s
b <--> s

Direct exchange of energy between buyer and seller in a decentralized fashion

System operator is informed about trades that occur

Types

Customized long-term contracts OTC (Over the counter) Electronic Trading
Consistently matches supply and offer bids
Flexible ✅ ❌
Private transactions ✅ ❌
Transaction costs High
(due to Broker)
Low \(\approx 0\)
Speed Fast
(allows for trading “until last second”)
Trade volume Large Small
Duration Long Small

Auctions in Energy Pool

  • All generation bids and consumption offers are placed at same time
  • No one knows about others’ bids and offers
  • Centralized market clearing decides bids and offers that are retained
  • Eventually, the system operator is informed about the trades that occurred

Merit Order

  • Consumption orders are ranked in dec price order
  • Supply bids are ranked in inc price order

image-20240408132602922

image-20240522095301733

Social Welfare

Area between consumption and generation

Equilibrium point is that which allows to maximize social welfare

  • Any buyer is to pay almost what they were ready to pay
  • Any seller will get at least what they were ready to sell for

image-20240408132650769

Market Clearing

Goal

  • Schedule for all supply and demand offers
  • Price at which market is cleared

Inputs

  • All offers in the market are formulated in terms of quantity \(Q\) and price \(P\)
  • Supply side
  • Set of offers
  • Maximum quantity for offer
  • Price for offer
  • Demand side
  • Set of offers
  • Maximum quantity for offer
  • Price for offer

Decision variables

  • Generation schedule
  • Consumption schedule

Objective: Maximize social welfare

Constraints

  • Non-negativity of supply and demand
  • Balance of generation and consumption
  • Generation and consumption within limits

Settlement Process

  • Who should pay what?
  • Who should get paid what amount?

Approaches

Pay-as-bid Uniform
Every party pays/receives whatever they bid the same equilibrium amount
Advantages Overcomes limitations of pay-as-bid
Yields budget balance: sum of revenues equal to sum of payments
Disadvantages Supplier may receive 0 revenue, which won’t cover their fixed costs
Consumers incentivized to lower bids; suppliers incentivized to increase bids

Both approaches guarantee

  • individual rationality: consumers will pay at most what they were ready to pay, and producers will receive at least what they were ready to receive
  • Revenue adequacy: Sum of revenues \(\ge\) Sum of payments

Geographic Prices

Prices vary across various locations, as power has to flow through network involved

Exchanges capacity limitations

  • There is a maximum amount of energy that can be exchanged from one location to another
  • When this limit is reached, there is congestion and prices for connected areas will different
  • Exchange capacity limitations are directly related to network constraints and operational practice

Approaches to handle exchange capacity limitations

Zonal Nodal
System Operator TSO ISO
Market Operator Ind. Market Operator ISO
Offers Market Products Unit Capabilities
Clearing Supply-demand equilibrium UCED Problem
Network representation Simplified Detailed
Prices Zonal Nodal
Used in Europe US

Market is not-budget balanced anymore, as the sum of consumer payments > sum of supplier revenues; difference defines congestion rent to be collected by system operator(s)

Approach 1: Split

Due to transmission constraints, the market has to be split and be treated as individual sub-markets

  • Submarkets have their own supply-demand equilibrium
  • Transmission-related offers: Extra (price-independent) consumption/generation offers representing the transmission from one zone to the next to be added

image-20240408140516023

Approach 2: Flow-based coupling

Instead of boldly splitting market, one could instead acknowledge how power flows

This allows clearing a single market with geographically-differentiated prices

image-20240408140855528

Regulation & Support Schemes

Grid parity = scenario when it is profitable to produce energy, ie Levelized Cost of Energy (cost of energy production) < market price

New energy generation tech may need support in order to reach grid parity

  • Regulation is an instrument for policy makers to support their integration in the market
  • Support schemes consist in financial support to make them competitive in the market

These have impact on participant revenues, offering strategies, market outcomes

Types

FIT FIP CFT
Meaning Feed-in-tariff Fixed Feed-in-Premium Contract for difference/ Sliding Premium
Implication Guaranteed price Fixed support regardless of market revenue Compensation of difference between guaranteed price and market revenue
Blue: Support revenue
Green: Market Revenue
image-20240408142003260 image-20240408142013848 image-20240408142024725
Implication for producer Just ensure you get scheduled
Bid as low as possible

Safe policy to guarantee non-negative equilibrium prices: FIP or CfD at 0

Last Updated: 2024-05-14 ; Contributors: AhmedThahir

Comments