Skip to content

Production Theory

Constrained optimization: Marginal Benefit = Marginal Cost 1. Maximize objective: Maximize Profit = Revenue - Cost 2. Constraint: Firms get to decide how much to produce

Let - \(q\) be quantity produced by firm - \(Q\) be quantity produced by entire market

Assumptions

Assumptions

Assumption Limitation
All firms are identical: Same production quantity and marginal cost Not realistic
Entry & Exit not possible in the short run
Entry & Exit is possible in the long run without any barrier of entry Barriers to entry: Sunk costs,
Input prices \(r_k, r_l\) are fixed Inputs could have upward sloping supply

Wage rate increases with increased production

Quantity

Factors of Production

Factor Example Short Run Long Run
Land Fixed? Fixed?
Labor \(l\) Variable Variable
Capital \(k\) Machines, buildings Fixed Variable
Technological innovation
\(A_t\)

Long run is the time period for which all inputs are variable

Production Function

Function that defines output as a function of input(s)

\[ q = f(A_t, la, l, k) \]

Total Factor Productivity

Productivity increase due to technology/innovation, keeping other factors constant

$$ A_t = \dfrac{q}{k^\alpha \times l^\beta} $$ \(\alpha, \beta =\) two inputs' respective shares of output

Marginal Productivity

\[ \begin{aligned} \text{MP}_l^q &= \frac{\partial q}{\partial l} \\ \text{MP}_k^q &= \frac{\partial q}{\partial k} \end{aligned} \]

Diminishing Marginal Productivity

With increase in input - total productivity increases - marginal productivity decreases

Graph
  • y = MP
  • x = input (l,k)

The graph will be a straight line with a downward slope

Isoquants

  • Similar concept to indifference curves
  • All the assumptions of indifference curves apply

Inputs \(q\)
Perfectly Substitutable \(l+k\)
Perfectly Non-Substitutable
Leontief Production Function
\(\min(l, k)\) Computers & Programmers

MRTS

Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution

Slope of Isoquant at a point, hence depends on the position on the isoquant

\[ \begin{aligned} \text{MRTS} &= -\dfrac{\partial k}{\partial l} \\ &= -\dfrac{\partial q}{\partial l} \times \dfrac{\partial k}{\partial q} \\ &= -\dfrac{\partial q}{\partial l} / \dfrac{\partial q}{\partial k} \\ &= -\text{MP}_l / \text{MP}_k \end{aligned} \]

Diminishing marginal productivity affects this

\[ \Delta l \cdot \text{MP}_l + \Delta k \cdot \text{MP}_k = 0 \]

Returns to Scale

What happens to production when you increase all inputs proportionally

Not \(k\) vs \(l\)

Returns to Scale \(f(a l, a k)\) Example
Constant \(a \cdot f(l, k)\)
Increasing \(> a \cdot f(l, k)\) Firm with increased inputs can specialize more
Decreasing \(< a \cdot f(l, k)\) Firm with increased inputs means more confusion

Production Possibility Frontier

deals with the production capacity of an economy

  • analyzes available resources
  • predicts what can be produced with those resources, with the assumption that time and technology are constant
  • analyzes various output mixes (combinations of different commodities)

Production Possibility curve

Curve that shows the optimal level of production for different combinations of outputs

what is the maximum output that can be produced of various commodities

Graph

  • \(y =\) commodity 2
  • \(x =\) commodity 1

The graph will be a curve

MRT

When we go from left to right, the slope increases from left to right, ie, cost of production of \(x\) increases

  • \(\text{MP}_k^y, \text{MP}_l^y\) increases
  • \(\text{MP}_k^x, \text{MP}_l^x\) decreases

Example: if mango’s MP is 2 and apple’s MP is 4, then 4 units of apples are to be sacrificed to produce 2 units of mangoes

\[ \begin{aligned} x &= l \cdot MP_l + k \cdot MP_k \\ \mathrm{d} y &= \mathrm{d} l_{y}(MP_l^y) + \mathrm{d} k_y(MP_k^y) \\ \mathrm{d} x &= \mathrm{d} l_{x}(MP_l^x) + \mathrm{d} k_x(MP_k^x) \\ \frac{\mathrm{d} y}{\mathrm{d} x} &= \frac{MP_k^y}{MP_k^x} = \frac{MP_l^y}{MP_l^x} \end{aligned} \]

Points on the curve

  • inside are inefficient input mix - wasting profit
  • on the curve are optimal input mix
  • outside is impossible input mix

Shift of PPC

It depends on type of technological change that occurs

also depends on change in the quantity and productivity of labor and capital

Type of Change increases productivity of labor increases productivity of capital Curve expands for
Labor-intensive ✅ ❌ motivates producers to increase labor rather than increasing machines labor-intensive good side
Capital-intensive ❌ ✅ motivates producers to increase machines rather than increasing labor capital-intensive good side
Neutral âś… âś… does not change the proportion in which labor and capital are used parallel shift (equal increase/decrease)

Output Mix

Efficient Inefficient Unattainable
Curve optimal points on the curve points inside the curve points outside the curve
Meaning Efficient performance Underperformance that level of output may be achieved in the future with the help of development, but not with the current resources
Interpretation it is impossible to increase the output of one commodity without sacrificing the output of another it is possible to increase the output of one commodity without decreasing the output of another it is not possible to reach that output, even by using all resources
Seen in Developed economies Developing economies

Costs

Types

Category Type Meaning Example
IDK Fixed Independent of quantity produced Machinery depreciation cost
Land
Variable Dependent on quantity produced Wages of employees
Utilities bill
Sunk Cannot be changed/undone regardless of whatever action

Long-Run Fixed Costs
Education
IDK explicit Direct Raw materials, labor costs
implicit Indirect 1. i work in my own restaurant. I lost my time, which could’ve been used somewhere else like some other restaurant/company
2. investing in your company. I could’ve invested it somewhere else, which could’ve earned me more money

Cost Function

$$ c = k r_k + l r_l $$ where - \(r_k =\) depreciation - \(r_l =\) wage rate

Substituting for \(k\) or \(l\) from the production function will give the relationship between \(C\) and \(q\)

Marginal Cost \(\dfrac{\partial c}{\partial Q}\)
Average Cost \(\dfrac{c}{q}\)
AVC
Average Variable Cost
\(\dfrac{c_v}{q}\)
AFC
Average Variable Cost
\(\dfrac{c_f}{q}\)
### Cost Curves

  • AC decreases and then increases
    • Increasing quantity helps amortize the fixed cost
Long-run
Short-run \(\text{MC} = \dfrac{r_l}{\text{MP}_l}\)

Isocost Curves

Efficient Input Mix

Efficient input mix is the tangent of the isocost and isoquant curves

Increase in wages

At the optimal input mix - MRTS = \(-\dfrac{r_l}{r_k}\) - \(\dfrac{\text{MP}_l}{r_l} =\dfrac{\text{MP}_k}{r_k}\)

Efficient input mix is said to be

  • Economically efficient if the costs associated with an input mix is minimal
  • Technically efficient if it is impossible to maintain the same output, without keeping the same inputs if any input decreases, the output also decreases
    • in India, we have a technically inefficient agricultural sector. This is proved by the fact that: even though many people moved to tertiary sector, it did not affect agricultural output

Long-Run Cost Curve

Expansion Path

How does cost change with production quantity

\(\text{MP}_l = \text{MP}_k\)
\(\text{MP}_l > \text{MP}_k\)
\(\text{MP}_l < \text{MP}_k\)

Increasing Cost of Inputs

Long-Run vs Short-Run

  • Long-run operations are always more efficient than short-run
    • You can optimize for both cost and capital in the long-run

Profit

Type \(\pi\)
Accounting \(R - C\)
Economic Corrected for opportunity costs
### Profit Maximization

Every company tries to maximize its profit.

Profits can be maximized by cost minimization through optimization of input mix. The input mix depends on 1. productivity of input factor (high is preffered) 2. price of input factor (low is preffered)

Labor is preferred for lower price; capital is preferred due to higher productivity

Assumption: In the short run, no firm enters/exits; capital is a sunk cost

\[ \begin{aligned} \pi_\max &= \max_p \Bigg \{ R - C \Bigg \} \\ &= \max_p \Bigg\{ p q_m - c \Big( q_m(p) \Big) \Bigg\} \end{aligned} \]

where - \(p\) is unit sale price - \(q(p)\) is units sold - \(c \Big( q(p) \Big)\) is cost - \(c' \Big( q(p) \Big)\) is the marginal cost

$$ \begin{aligned} \dfrac{\partial \pi}{\partial q} &= \dfrac{\partial R}{\partial q} - \dfrac{\partial C}{\partial q} \ 0 &= \text{MR} - \text{MC} \ \implies \text{MR} &= \text{MC} \end{aligned} $$ For perfectly-competitive market - \(\text{MR}(Q)\) = \(P(Q)\) - Hence, at market equilibrium, \(q\) for which \(\text{MC}(Q) = P\)

Average Profit

\[ \begin{aligned} \text{AP} &= \dfrac{r}{q} - \dfrac{c}{q} \\ &= p - \text{AC} \end{aligned} \]

Taxation

Fixed Tax Per-Unit Tax
Optimal Quantity No change Reduced
Profit Reduced Reduced
Curves No change

Shutdown Decision

Producer still part of the market, but does not produce anything

Sometimes, producing something is better than nothing, as making low loss is better than extreme loss

Short-run: Only shutdown if - revenue is lower than variable cost, as you have to pay fixed cost regardless - \(Pq < \text{VC}\) - ie, \(P < \text{AVC}\)

Firm vs Market Demand

$$ q(P) = Q(P) - S^0(P) $$ - \(q(P)=\) Firm demand - \(Q(P)=\) Market demand - \(S^0(P) =\) Residual demand = how much competition is selling

Even with inelastic \(Q\), \(q\) can be elastic

\[ \begin{aligned} \dfrac{dq}{dP} &= \dfrac{dQ}{dP} - \dfrac{dS^0}{dP} \\ %% e_{di} &= E_d - E_s \end{aligned} \]

\(\dfrac{dS^0}{dP} > 0\) as number of suppliers will inc with inc in selling price

If there are \(N\) identical firms - \(Q = Nq, S^0 = (N-1)q\) - \(e_{di} = N E_d - (N-1)E_s\) - \(e_d =\) Firm demand elasticity - \(E_d =\) Market demand elasticity - \(E_d =\) Market supply elasticity

Firm Entry/Exit

Only in the long-run

Happens when long-run profit > Barrier of entry

Entry Exit

Outcome of Competition

  • Forces each supplier to produce efficiently
  • Forces entry and exit of suppliers until

such that - Price = Marginal Cost = Min of Average Cost - Total profit of market = 0

Different Firms

Last Updated: 2024-12-26 ; Contributors: AhmedThahir, web-flow

Comments